Bipolar Research Today is a free monthly online journal that collates and summarizes the latest research about Bipolar, including details on bipolar disorder, symptoms, treatment, depression, medication. | ||||||||
|
Reviewing the diagnostic validity and utility of mixed depression (depressive mixed states).Benazzi F Hecker Psychiatry Research Center, University of California at San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA; Collaborating Center, Forli, Italy; Department of Psychiatry University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary; Department of Psychiatry, National Health Service, Forli, Italy. OBJECTIVE: To review the diagnostic validity and utility of mixed depression, i.e. co-occurrence of depression and manic/hypomanic symptoms. METHODS: PubMed search of all English-language papers published between January 1966 and December 2006 using and cross-listing key words: bipolar disorder, mixed states, criteria, utility, validation, gender, temperament, depression-mixed states, mixed depression, depressive mixed state/s, dysphoric hypomania, mixed hypomania, mixed/dysphoric mania, agitated depression, anxiety disorders, neuroimaging, pathophysiology, and genetics. A manual review of paper reference lists was also conducted. RESULTS: By classic diagnostic validators, the diagnostic validity of categorically-defined mixed depression (i.e. at least 2-3 manic/hypomanic symptoms) is mainly supported by family history (the current strongest diagnostic validator). Its diagnostic utility is supported by treatment response (negative effects of antidepressants). A dimensionally-defined mixed depression is instead supported by a non-bi-modal distribution of its intradepression manic/hypomanic symptoms. DISCUSSION: Categorically-defined mixed depression may have some diagnostic validity (family history is the current strongest validator). Its diagnostic utility seems supported by treatment response. Published 3 September 2007 in Eur Psychiatry.
© 2004-2008 Bipolar Research Today. All Rights Reserved. |
| ||||||